- FAB recognised as the safest bank in the UAE and the Middle East
- Santander InnoVentures invests in Mexican start-up ePesos to advance financial inclusion
- Renewed optimism for UK investors but bad news for UK assets, says Lloyds
- IBM announces new blockchain banking solution
- HSBC introduces Matched electronic Purchase Orders
- Private banking AUMs bounce back in Asia-Pacific
- Ohpen recognised for its investment and innovation in the UK expired
- Deloitte and Avaloq release joint whitepaper dedicated to digital wealth advisory expired
- Oracle launches financial services transaction filtering expired
- Banks plan to make major investments in Open Banking by 2020 expired
- Goldman Sachs reports good overall performance for Q3 expired
- Fifth Third to advance B2B accounts payable for commercial clients expired
16th June 2017
City of London responds to potential shift of euro clearing
It has been revealed that London could lose its euro clearing role when the UK leaves the European Union in 2019. A draft law by EU aims to give it the power to decide whether to move the lucrative euro clearing business post Brexit. European Commission vice-president Valdis Dombrovskis said Brexit needed "certain adjustments to our rules".
In response to the European Commission’s paper on euro-clearing, Catherine McGuinness, Policy Chairman at the City of London Corporation, said: “London is the unparalleled leader when it comes to clearing. The UK accounts for 40 per cent of the global trading. In contrast, the remaining EU27 member states account for less than 10 per cent of the combined market share. The EU is simply not equipped to handle the volume of clearing that the UK does each day.
“Each day the UK clears on average $2.1tn – more than the EUR885bn cleared, yet the US is not suggesting this function is repatriated. In taking steps to shift power away from UK clearing houses, the EU could damage itself unnecessarily. Fragmentation of foreign exchange and interest rate trading across Europe and the rest of the world could lead to firms’ costs increasing by as much as 20 per cent.
“We are also concerned that a location policy would impact across the international ecosystem in terms of market fragmentation and could increase systemic risk. The UK is the only place that can guarantee financial stability with the lowest possible cost implications. We do however welcome a structured and constructive discussion on these issues.”