- EBA sees further improvements in EU banks’ resilience
- Barclays enables vulnerable customers to stop transactions at chosen retailers
- Momentum building for Open Banking in 2019, says Equifax
- FCA introduces new rules on handling complaints about authorised push payment fraud
- RBS welcomes credit ratings upgrade by Fitch Ratings
- Entersekt gains early certification for e-commerce authentication solution
- International Bank of Azerbaijan chooses FICO solution expired
- Revised budget deficit positive for Italian banks, but headwinds still threaten, says Scope expired
- Barclays’ merchant control demonstrates sector's moral shift expired
- FRC issues revised auditing standard and consults on guidance for quality bank audits expired
- Monobank celebrates growth milestone in first year of operation expired
- FS sector set to face yet more regulation in 2019, says ClusterSeven expired
21st September 2018
Chief executive of Danske Bank resigns after money-laundering investigation
It has been reported that the chief executive of Danske Bank, Thomas Borgen, has resigned in the wake of alleged money-laundering involving its Estonian operation. Mr Borgen quit following an internal investigation into payments through its Estonian branch.
The BBC reported that the Danish bank believed many of the payments were suspicious. The bank said it was unable to determine how much money was believed to have been laundered through the branch between 2007 and 2015, but it’s thought to be in the region of EUR200bn.
Mr Borgen said it was clear Danske had failed to live up to its responsibilities, which he regretted. "Even though the investigation conducted by the external law firm concludes that I have lived up to my legal obligations, I believe that it is best for all parties that I resign," he said.
Estonia's Financial Supervision Authority (FSA) is now examining the findings of Danske's internal investigation. Estonian FSA chairman Kilvar Kessler said: "The report describes serious shortcomings in the organisation of Danske Bank, where risk appetite and risk control were not in balance.”